Independent security testing · Melbourne based · Remote delivery
Independent penetration testing and security reviews for the systems your team depends on.
We help you understand real attack paths before launch, procurement, remediation work, or a higher-risk AI rollout.
Scope agreed first
Boundaries, access expectations, timing, and constraints are confirmed before work begins.
Findings for engineers and leaders
Reports are written for engineering, security, leadership, procurement, and customer-facing teams.
Handled discreetly
Access, data handling expectations, and sensitive-environment requirements are set before the engagement starts.
Remediation guidance
Findings include reproduction detail and remediation guidance so teams can resolve issues.
Proof and methodology
See how testing is scoped, validated, and reported before you enquire.
If you are comparing providers, start with the methodology and report structure. They show how technical findings are explained for engineers, leaders, procurement, and customer-facing teams.
AI is a live risk surface
Review the workflow around the model before it touches sensitive data or important business decisions.
When assistants retrieve internal data or call tools, we look at permissions, evidence, exposure, and the ways prompts or tools can fail.
Core services
Security testing shaped around the risk you need to understand.
Choose the service by attack surface and risk.
Application penetration testing
Web apps, mobile clients, APIs, authentication, authorisation, tenant boundaries, and business-critical workflow logic.
Infrastructure penetration testing
Internet exposure, remote access, cloud identity, segmentation, management surfaces, and operational attack paths.
Security posture assessment
Posture assessment across governance, identity, resilience, and vendors.
AI security review
Review copilots, retrieval systems, automated workflows, and the permissions around data and tools.
How engagements work
Understand the risk, test the system, and give your team clear findings to work from.
1. Align the review
We align the review with your system, timeline, and decision. Boundaries, authorisation, and communication are agreed before testing starts.
2. Verify the findings
Tools help widen coverage, but material findings are checked manually and weighed against likely impact.
3. Deliver concise reports
Reports explain what was found, what was excluded, and what to do next.
4. Plan follow-up
Your team gets evidence for launch readiness, risk review, procurement, and remediation planning.
Who this is for
Written for the people who need to use the outcome: engineering, procurement, leadership, and customer-facing teams.
Launch readiness
Validate critical attack paths before a major release, enterprise rollout, or higher-stakes customer launch.
Customer reviews
Provide evidence for questionnaires, procurement checks, and third-party assessments.
Remediation planning
Turn uncertainty into a concrete fix list with technical detail and prioritisation.
Sensitive AI rollout
Test what assistants, copilots, or automations can access, trigger, or expose before rollout.
Fresh insights
Understand the problem before you define the work.
Insights on penetration testing, AI security, and remediation decisions.
What AI security review looks like in 2026
How retrieval, tool access, approvals, and automated behaviour change the review approach.
What modern app penetration testing covers
Why a meaningful review spans the web app, mobile client, APIs, identity, and workflow logic together.
Secure AI automation without losing control
How to gain speed from AI-powered workflows without losing approvals, oversight, or accountability.
Start the conversation
Request a quote
Tell us what needs reviewing, when you need it, and who will rely on the result.
Request a quote
Tell us what needs reviewing, when you need it, and who will rely on the result.